Obama Twists and Shouts

 Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) said this:
“I have very little tolerance for people who tell me that they graduate with $200,000 of debt or even $80,000 of debt because there’s no reason for that,” Rep. Foxx said in a radio interview.
“We live in an opportunity society and people are forgetting that. I remind folks all the time that the Declaration of Independence says ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’ You don’t sit on your butt and have it dumped in your lap,” she added.

Here's what Obama said she said:
“I want to read a quote. This is from a Republican congresswoman. I didn’t really understand this. I’m quoting her,” the president said.
“She said that she has ‘very little tolerance for people who tell me they graduate with debt because there’s no reason for that.’ She said, students who rack up student loan debt are just sitting on their butts, having opportunity ‘dumped in your lap.’”

 I think this is a good example as to how people like Obama twist other peoples words to get the reaction they want from whomever they're talking to. It can be as simple as leaving a word or two out, or adding a word or two. Changes everything don't it?

Tea Partyers Are Violent Extremist Hostage Takers

     I'm sure everybody has noticed the heightened labeling of Repubs, conservatives and the Tea Party as terrorists, killers, psychotics, addicts, extremists, hostage takers and on and on. Has anybody noticed that the Dept. of Homeland Security and TSA have now expanded their "criteria" and methods for finding terrorists? They're now looking for home grown terrorists. They are using Israeli methods to "sniff" out terrorists by casually asking them questions and paying close attention to mannerisms.
     They've put out a video of who to look for. Were they Muslims? Nope. They were white extremists...exactly what the Main Stream Media is now labeling Repubs, conservatives and the Tea Party. Now, given that the accepted narrative is that the Tea Partiers are extremists, violent hostage takers, killers, terrorists.... I wonder what they will consider suspicious now ... and now that we are those things what about the writings, speeches, web sites and such? Will they go after that on the grounds that it could promote violence and terrorism?
     I find it quite disturbing that the Main Stream Media and the Democrats are saying nearly the EXACT same things about us. Almost like it was coordinated.
     A cursory glance at the history of dictatorships and how they got to be would show that what is happening here is frighteningly close to how dictatorships and the like have gotten into power in the past. They are putting their opposition into a category and then changing their security measures to look for people in that category, thus eliminating their opposition.

I apologize for my lack of writing skills but I think you can get an idea of what I'm trying to say.

Scott